2009 Acura TL vs. 1973 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura TL (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1973 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1973 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1973 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura TL | 1973 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | TL | DeVille |
Year Released | 2009 | 1973 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 5880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3310 mm |