2009 Acura TL vs. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura TL weights approximately 312 kg more than 1979 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura TL | 1979 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Acura | Chrysler |
Model | TL | Le Baron |
Year Released | 2009 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 3678 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1852 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2870 mm |