2009 Acura TL vs. 1991 Audi S2
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Audi S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Audi S2 would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura TL (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1991 Audi S2. (216 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1991 Audi S2.
Because 1991 Audi S2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Acura TL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Audi S2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Audi S2 (309 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura TL. (254 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1991 Audi S2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura TL. 2009 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1991 Audi S2 has manual transmission. 1991 Audi S2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura TL | 1991 Audi S2 | |
Make | Acura | Audi |
Model | TL | S2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 2226 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 254 Nm | 309 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 14.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |