2009 Acura TL vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Acura TL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura TL. (370 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura TL. 2009 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura TL | 2000 Holden HRT | |
Make | Acura | Holden |
Model | TL | HRT |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 306 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 370 Nm | 815 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |