2009 Acura TL vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura TL (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura TL. (254 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura TL | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
| Make | Acura | Lancia |
| Model | TL | Nea |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3471 cc | 2445 cc |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 254 Nm | 314 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2590 mm |
