2009 Acura TL vs. 2003 BMW 520
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW 520 would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura TL (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2003 BMW 520. (167 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2003 BMW 520.
Because 2003 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura TL (254 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 BMW 520. (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura TL | 2003 BMW 520 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | TL | 520 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 2171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 254 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 10.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.2 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.3 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |