2009 Acura TL vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Epica would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura TL (280 HP) has 127 more horse power than 2006 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura TL (344 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2009 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura TL | 2006 Holden Epica | |
Make | Acura | Holden |
Model | TL | Epica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |