2009 Acura TSX vs. 1950 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Acura TSX is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura TSX weights approximately 36 kg more than 1950 Cadillac 62.
Because 1950 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura TSX | 1950 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | TSX | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2354 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3210 mm |
