2009 Acura TSX vs. 1955 Buick 40
To start off, 2009 Acura TSX is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Buick 40 (234 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2009 Acura TSX. (201 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2009 Acura TSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura TSX weights approximately 63 kg more than 1955 Buick 40.
Because 1955 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura TSX. (231 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura TSX.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura TSX | 1955 Buick 40 | |
Make | Acura | Buick |
Model | TSX | 40 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2354 cc | 5277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 234 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 447 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1725 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3110 mm |