2009 Acura TSX vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2009 Acura TSX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Acura TSX. (201 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2009 Acura TSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 327 kg more than 2009 Acura TSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura TSX | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | TSX | Sixty |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2354 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |