2009 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 2001 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2009 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2009 Alfa Romeo 147. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2009 Alfa Romeo 147. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Jaguar XK weights approximately 205 kg more than 2009 Alfa Romeo 147. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Alfa Romeo 147. (305 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Alfa Romeo 147. 2001 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 2009 Alfa Romeo 147 has manual transmission. 2009 Alfa Romeo 147 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Alfa Romeo 147 | 2001 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 147 | XK |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.0:1 | 10.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 206 km/hour | 251 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 75 L |