2009 Alfa Romeo 159 vs. 1966 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 208 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 395 kg more than 2009 Alfa Romeo 159.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Alfa Romeo 159, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Alfa Romeo 159 | 1966 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 159 | Sixty |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 82 L |