2009 Alfa Romeo Brera vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera (256 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Alfa Romeo Brera | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | Brera | 62 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3195 cc | 6389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |