2009 Alfa Romeo Brera vs. 1966 Alpine A 110
To start off, 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera (256 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1966 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera should accelerate faster than 1966 Alpine A 110.
Because 1966 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Alfa Romeo Brera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Alfa Romeo Brera | 1966 Alpine A 110 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Alpine |
Model | Brera | A 110 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3195 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 38 L |