2009 Alfa Romeo GT vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp

To start off, 2009 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2009 Alfa Romeo GT. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 2009 Alfa Romeo GT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 234 kg more than 2009 Alfa Romeo GT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Alfa Romeo GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Alfa Romeo GT. (163 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Alfa Romeo GT.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Alfa Romeo GT 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
Make Alfa Romeo Hudson
Model GT Super Wasp
Year Released 2009 1953
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1747 cc 4293 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 140 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 163 Nm 349 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 90.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82.7 mm 111.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 7.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1365 kg 1599 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 5160 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1980 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 3030 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 75 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]