2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs. 1949 Jaguar Mark IV
To start off, 2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jaguar Mark IV would be higher. At 2,663 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Jaguar Mark IV is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jaguar Mark IV weights approximately 595 kg more than 2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo.
Because 1949 Jaguar Mark IV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Jaguar Mark IV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo | 1949 Jaguar Mark IV | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
| Model | MiTo | Mark IV |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1366 cc | 2663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 63 L |
