2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Alfa Romeo MiTo | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Westfield |
Model | MiTo | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1366 cc | 1779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2320 mm |