2009 Alpina B3 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2009 Alpina B3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 3,346 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Alpina B3 weights approximately 244 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Alpina B3 (362 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2009 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2009 Alpina B3 has manual transmission. 2009 Alpina B3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Alpina B3 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | B3 | Equator |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3346 cc | 1787 cc |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 362 Nm | 160 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3260 mm |