2009 Alpina B3 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo
To start off, 2009 Alpina B3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Alpina B3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Alpina B3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Alpina B3 | 2002 Chevrolet Relsamo | |
Make | Alpina | Chevrolet |
Model | B3 | Relsamo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |