2009 Alpina B3 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2009 Alpina B3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2009 Alpina B3. (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2009 Alpina B3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 275 kg more than 2009 Alpina B3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Alpina B3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Alpina B3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Alpina B3. (335 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Alpina B3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Alpina B3 | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Alpina | Jaguar |
| Model | B3 | XJ |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 335 Nm | 541 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3040 mm |
