2009 Alpina B3 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Alpina B3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Alpina B3 (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 2009 Alpina B3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Alpina B3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Alpina B3 (335 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (140 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Alpina B3 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Alpina | Volkswagen |
Model | B3 | Polo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 335 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 184 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |