2009 Alpina B7 vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2009 Alpina B7 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Alpina B7 (493 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Alpina B7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2009 Alpina B7.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Alpina B7 (700 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-250. (389 Nm). This means 2009 Alpina B7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Alpina B7 | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | B7 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4397 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 493 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 700 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.8 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1990 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 132 L |