2009 Alpina Roadster vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2009 Alpina Roadster is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Alpina Roadster (296 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Alpina Roadster should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 261 kg more than 2009 Alpina Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Alpina Roadster | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Alpina | Hudson |
| Model | Roadster | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3346 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93.8 mm | 114.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 265 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3160 mm |
