2009 Alpina Roadster vs. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2009 Alpina Roadster is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 145 kg more than 2009 Alpina Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 2009 Alpina Roadster has manual transmission. 2009 Alpina Roadster will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Alpina Roadster | 1980 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Alpina | Chrysler |
Model | Roadster | Le Baron |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3346 cc | 3678 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2870 mm |