2009 Alpina Roadster vs. 2004 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2009 Alpina Roadster is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 3,346 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Alpina Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Alpina Roadster (296 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2004 Ford Taurus. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Alpina Roadster should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 105 kg more than 2009 Alpina Roadster.
Because 2009 Alpina Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Alpina Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Alpina Roadster (362 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Taurus. (250 Nm). This means 2009 Alpina Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Alpina Roadster | 2004 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | Roadster | Taurus |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3346 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 362 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.8 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |