2009 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 (464 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 385 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 668 kg more than 1964 Singer Vogue III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DB9 | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
Make | Aston Martin | Singer |
Model | DB9 | Vogue III |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 464 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 81.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 76.2 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1092 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 47 L |