2009 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1982 Mini Clubman
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 5,933 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1982 Mini Clubman.
Because 2009 Aston Martin DB9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Aston Martin DB9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DB9 | 1982 Mini Clubman | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mini |
Model | DB9 | Clubman |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5933 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 510 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2140 mm |