2009 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 (464 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 406 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (58 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 880 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Aston Martin DB9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Aston Martin DB9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 (443 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DB9 | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Aston Martin | Renault |
Model | DB9 | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 464 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 443 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.9 L/100km | 5.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.4 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 50 L |