2009 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 (464 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 544 kg more than 2009 Aston Martin DB9.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 (443 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2009 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DB9 | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | DB9 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 464 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 443 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 21.4 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 132 L |