2009 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 2006 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,933 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 (510 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2006 Nissan Armada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Aston Martin DB9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DB9 (570 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DB9 | 2006 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Aston Martin | Nissan |
Model | DB9 | Armada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5933 cc | 5555 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 510 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1760 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.3 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 106 L |