2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 1953 Austin A 135
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 5,933 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 385 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 135. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 135.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (420 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 135. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 135.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 1953 Austin A 135 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Austin |
Model | DBS | A 135 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5933 cc | 3993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 503 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1900 mm |