2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (510 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 313 more horse power than 1960 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 1960 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
Model | DBS | 62 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 510 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 79 L |