2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 1963 Simca 1000
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 5,933 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 452 more horse power than 1963 Simca 1000. (51 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 1963 Simca 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (420 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Simca 1000. (73 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 1963 Simca 1000 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Simca |
Model | DBS | 1000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5933 cc | 943 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 503 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 73 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 8.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1530 mm |