2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 1964 Austin A 90
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 5,933 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 383 more horse power than 1964 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 1964 Austin A 90.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (420 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Austin A 90. (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Austin A 90.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 1964 Austin A 90 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Austin |
Model | DBS | A 90 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5933 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 503 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 83.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1750 mm |