2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 1964 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 5,933 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 485 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2009 Aston Martin DBS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Aston Martin DBS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 1964 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Aston Martin | Citroen |
Model | DBS | 2CV |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5933 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 503 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.9 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |