2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,933 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 414 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (420 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Triumph |
Model | DBS | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5933 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 503 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |