2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 1965 Ford Corsair
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Corsair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Corsair would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (510 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 434 more horse power than 1965 Ford Corsair. (76 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Corsair.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (571 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 436 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Corsair. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Corsair.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 1965 Ford Corsair | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | DBS | Corsair |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 1663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 510 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 571 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 93.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 60.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 45 L |