2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 1966 DKW F 102

To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 5,933 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 444 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102.

Because 2009 Aston Martin DBS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Aston Martin DBS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (420 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Aston Martin DBS 1966 DKW F 102
Make Aston Martin DKW
Model DBS F 102
Year Released 2009 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5933 cc 1175 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 503 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 420 Nm 103 Nm
Torque RPM 5750 RPM 2250 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 85.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 68 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.9:1 7.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1620 mm