2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 1986 Ford Sierra
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (510 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 350 more horse power than 1986 Ford Sierra. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Sierra.
Because 1986 Ford Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Aston Martin DBS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (571 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 355 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Ford Sierra. (216 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Ford Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 1986 Ford Sierra | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | DBS | Sierra |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 510 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 571 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 68.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 116 L |