2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 1986 Mini MK V
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mini MK V would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (510 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 469 more horse power than 1986 Mini MK V. (41 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 1986 Mini MK V.
Because 2009 Aston Martin DBS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Aston Martin DBS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mini MK V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (571 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 501 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mini MK V. (70 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mini MK V.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 1986 Mini MK V | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mini |
Model | DBS | MK V |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 510 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 571 Nm | 70 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2040 mm |