2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2009 Aston Martin DBS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Aston Martin DBS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (571 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Holden XU 6. (515 Nm). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Holden XU 6. 1996 Holden XU 6 has automatic transmission and 2009 Aston Martin DBS has manual transmission. 2009 Aston Martin DBS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden XU 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Holden |
Model | DBS | XU 6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 510 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 571 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |