2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Aston Martin DBS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 5,933 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 313 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (190 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Because 2009 Aston Martin DBS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Aston Martin DBS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (420 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Celica. (177 Nm). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Aston Martin | Toyota |
Model | DBS | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5933 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 503 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 177 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1730 mm |