2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Aston Martin DBS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Aston Martin DBS would be higher. At 5,933 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 429 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ka. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ka.
Because 2009 Aston Martin DBS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Aston Martin DBS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (420 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Ka. (145 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Aston Martin | Ford |
Model | DBS | Ka |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5933 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 503 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5750 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 17.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 307 km/hour | 161 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 16.9 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |