2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 2011 Chevrolet Volt
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Volt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Aston Martin DBS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Aston Martin DBS would be higher. At 5,933 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (503 HP) has 354 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Volt. (149 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Volt.
Because 2009 Aston Martin DBS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Aston Martin DBS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Volt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (420 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chevrolet Volt. (370 Nm). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chevrolet Volt.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Aston Martin DBS | 2011 Chevrolet Volt | |
Make | Aston Martin | Chevrolet |
Model | DBS | Volt |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5933 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 503 HP | 149 HP |
Torque | 420 Nm | 370 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1788 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.7 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |