2009 Aston Martin DBS vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Aston Martin DBS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Aston Martin DBS would be higher. At 5,933 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Aston Martin DBS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 362 more horse power than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (141 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Aston Martin DBS should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda BT-50.

Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Aston Martin DBS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Aston Martin DBS (420 Nm @ 5750 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (330 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 Aston Martin DBS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda BT-50.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Aston Martin DBS 2011 Mazda BT-50
Make Aston Martin Mazda
Model DBS BT-50
Year Released 2009 2011
Body Type Coupe Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5933 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 503 HP 141 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 420 Nm 330 Nm
Torque RPM 5750 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.9:1 18.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Top Speed 307 km/hour 158 km/hour
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1810 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 16.9 L/100km 8.9 L/100km