2009 Audi A3 vs. 1942 Jeep MB
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Jeep MB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Jeep MB would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1942 Jeep MB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1942 Jeep MB. (59 HP @ 3820 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1942 Jeep MB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Jeep MB weights approximately 185 kg more than 2009 Audi A3.
Because 1942 Jeep MB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Jeep MB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1942 Jeep MB. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1942 Jeep MB.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A3 | 1942 Jeep MB | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A3 | MB |
Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3820 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2040 mm |