2009 Audi A3 vs. 1955 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2009 Audi A3. (251 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 545 kg more than 2009 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A3 | 1955 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A3 | 62 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 5424 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1455 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1970 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3290 mm |