2009 Audi A3 vs. 1958 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1958 Jeep CJ. (135 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1958 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Jeep CJ weights approximately 250 kg more than 2009 Audi A3.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Audi A3. (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A3 | 1958 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A3 | CJ |
Year Released | 2009 | 1958 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1948 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 326 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2060 mm |