2009 Audi A3 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62

To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1110 kg more than 2009 Audi A3.

Because 1961 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Audi A3 1961 Cadillac 62
Make Audi Cadillac
Model A3 62
Year Released 2009 1961
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1983 cc 6389 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 4800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.6 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.8 mm 98.4 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 2140 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 5650 mm
Vehicle Width 1970 mm 2040 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 3300 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 79 L