2009 Audi A3 vs. 1964 Holden EJ
To start off, 2009 Audi A3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Holden EJ weights approximately 200 kg more than 2009 Audi A3.
Because 1964 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2009 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Audi A3 | 1964 Holden EJ | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A3 | EJ |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 2260 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |